<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Blocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediatorshandbook.com/http:/mediatorshandbook.com/2009/3-process/building-blocks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediatorshandbook.com/http:/mediatorshandbook.com/2009/3-process/building-blocks</link>
	<description>Writing the 4th edition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:23:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Sgorbati</title>
		<link>http://mediatorshandbook.com/http:/mediatorshandbook.com/2009/3-process/building-blocks/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Sgorbati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediatorshandbook.com/?p=97#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Dear Jennifer,
Looking at the new terms, I guess I still feel that it is better to have strong terms that identify clearly the sections.  Your new terms are great, but seem more descriptive for mediators in understanding the process than words that communicate directly to the participants.  So possibly,
Listening without Interruption
Exchange of Views
Identifying Issues and Topics
Developing Options
Reaching Decisions

I totally will accept whatever you feel is best, because you are the author and should go with your instincts and experience.  I will ask my students when I see them on Thursday what they think about the language.  All the best,  Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jennifer,<br />
Looking at the new terms, I guess I still feel that it is better to have strong terms that identify clearly the sections.  Your new terms are great, but seem more descriptive for mediators in understanding the process than words that communicate directly to the participants.  So possibly,<br />
Listening without Interruption<br />
Exchange of Views<br />
Identifying Issues and Topics<br />
Developing Options<br />
Reaching Decisions</p>
<p>I totally will accept whatever you feel is best, because you are the author and should go with your instincts and experience.  I will ask my students when I see them on Thursday what they think about the language.  All the best,  Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

