The Relating to young participants part is very good. The bold points are clear and will guide adult mediators to build connections with young people so that they can talk as equals.

Note: page 17 insert “pay”, should read, “need to pay extra”

Groups of teens heading – thinking about this heading…the focus is on the mediator’s role and our expectation within a group of teens.

Options: Let the kids or teens talk separately – I assume that you mean with a mediator present. Posturing and uncertainty about the “other side” makes genuine conversation difficult without someone there to facilitate.

The role of the mediator dealing with power imbalance – making sure adult particapants do not lecture and silence the voice of young participants. Like interrupting “you should” speeches. Though on the other side, sometimes particular adults (elders) can remind young participants about behaviors in the community. What do you think?

More to come.

Bill

I would like to ask another question.

When do you think we can use “agenda setting” or “identifing issues”?
For some conflict between very close people, agenda setting with visual tool is too business-like. However I still believe agenda setting is very useful for facilitation.

Please explain your thought on agenda setting.
If you still think it important, please explain when to use.

Now I am trying to draw a flow for the “Reaching Resolution” phase. It’s difficult to make it simple!! I’ll post it when I have a good draft.

JB

I would like to read more examples connected with them.
And I want use them in my training.